config_profile_get_computed_config_profile_by_uuid

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description adds almost nothing beyond the HTTP method 'GET', which weakly implies a read-only operation. It does not explain what 'computed' means, whether the result is derived/rendered at request time, auth requirements, or whether any caching or rate limits apply.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Short, but the raw 'GET /api/...' line and the 'Get computed config profile by uuid' sentence are redundant restatements of the same fact, and the 'Tags: Config Profiles Controller' trailer is internal noise rather than agent-facing guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With one parameter, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is the only source of context, yet it omits any description of the returned computed configuration or error behavior. It is barely sufficient for an agent to call the tool blindly by uuid.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry parameter meaning. It only shows uuid as a path segment; the uuid regex pattern and format live entirely in the schema. No explanation of what the uuid identifies or what happens if it is unknown.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Get computed config profile by uuid') and the HTTP route confirms the operation. It is clear what the tool does, but it never contrasts itself with the closely named sibling config_profile_get_config_profile_by_uuid, so an agent must infer the 'computed' distinction on its own.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of alternatives, even though config_profile_get_config_profile_by_uuid is an obvious neighboring read tool. Usage is only implied by the endpoint name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.