subscription_get_subscription_info_by_short_uuid

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does disclose that the endpoint is public ('[Public]'), which is mild behavioral context, but it says nothing about what data is returned, whether it requires auth, or any rate/format constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short and front-loaded with the route, but a raw HTTP endpoint plus a 'Tags:' string is low-value boilerplate for an agent rather than useful prose. Nothing is bloated, but little of it earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, no annotations, and no parameter documentation, the description should explain what 'info' contains and how to obtain it. It instead offers only a REST route dump, leaving the agent without the information needed to call or interpret the tool confidently.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the single parameter is only implied by the raw route string '/api/sub/{shortUuid}/info'. The description does not explain that shortUuid is the subscription's short identifier, nor its format, so it barely compensates for the schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb and resource (get subscription info by short UUID) and repeats the tool name, so the basic purpose is understandable. However, it gives no differentiation from the many closely related siblings such as subscriptions_get_subscription_by_short_uuid_protected, subscriptions_get_raw_subscription_by_short_uuid, and subscription_get_subscription, leaving the agent unable to tell which of these actually applies.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no mention of prerequisites, and no named alternative. The only hint is the '[Public] Subscription Controller' tag, which does not help the agent choose between this tool and the near-identical subscription lookups in the sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.