subscription_page_config_get_all_configs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It does not disclose whether the result is paginated, sorted, filtered, or what authentication or permissions are required. The only behavioral signal is 'Get all,' which implies a full unfiltered read but is not elaborated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two functional lines plus a boilerplate 'Tags' line. The core sentence is front-loaded and brief, but the HTTP path and controller tag metadata occupy space without helping an agent decide or invoke. Adequate but not tightly edited.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter read tool with no output schema, the description is minimally viable. It omits return shape, pagination, and sort behavior, which an agent listing configs would likely need, but nothing is strictly required for invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. There are no parameter semantics to clarify, and the description appropriately does not invent any.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Get all subscription page configs,' which is a clear verb+resource, but it provides no differentiation from siblings like subscription_page_config_get_config_by_uuid or subscription_template_get_all_templates beyond the narrow resource name. It restates the tool name without adding scope or distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit when-to-use guidance, no alternatives named, and no exclusions. The agent must infer from the name alone that this is the bulk-list variant versus the by-UUID variant.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.