acedatacloud_update_credential

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears the transparency burden. It discloses that confirmation is required, which is a critical behavior, but it does not mention permissions, reversibility, or side effects of updates. The partial disclosure is helpful but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, and contains no redundant information. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema, rich input schema, and a straightforward update operation, the description plus schema is sufficient for an agent to invoke the tool correctly. The only gap is the absence of alternative guidance, which is already captured in usage_guidelines.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides 100% coverage with detailed descriptions for all 8 parameters. The description adds marginal value by repeating the fields in prose, but it does not clarify semantics beyond what the schema already explains. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Update') and the specific resource ('credential'), and enumerates the modifiable aspects (limits, name, expiry, API allowlist). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like create, get, rotate, and delete.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied through the verb 'Update' and field list, but there is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The note 'Requires confirmation' hints at a prerequisite but does not explain when to choose this over other credential operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.