acedatacloud_delete_platform_token

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosure. It clearly states the irreversible nature and the requirement for confirm=true, which are critical. However, it omits other behavioral details such as idempotency, permissions needed, or behavior when the token does not exist.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: a single sentence that conveys the core purpose and key behavioral trait (irreversibility) and a critical usage requirement. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (delete a token by ID with confirmation) and that an output schema exists (handling return values), the description covers the essential aspects. It could mention success/error scenarios, but for a basic deletion tool it is adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with both parameters already documented. The description adds value by emphasizing the constraint that 'confirm=true' is required, reinforcing the boolean parameter's role and the irreversible consequence.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete (revoke)') and the resource ('a platform token'), making the tool's purpose unambiguous. It distinguishes itself well from siblings like acedatacloud_create_platform_token and acedatacloud_list_platform_tokens.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides minimal guidance: it notes that the action is irreversible and requires 'confirm=true'. However, it does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention any prerequisites (e.g., needing the token ID from list_platform_tokens).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.