acedatacloud_get_site

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It does not mention side effects, permissions, or any behavior beyond fetching. For a read operation, one might infer safety, but nothing explicit is stated. The description adds no behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one short sentence), but it is under-specified rather than efficiently concise. It essentially paraphrases the tool name without adding substantive detail, so it fails the 'earn its place' test. It is not verbose, but it also provides minimal value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values are not required in the description. However, given the large set of sibling tools and the vague term 'site,' the description should explain what a site is or when this tool is appropriate. It does not provide sufficient context for an agent to correctly select it over similar 'get_' or 'list_' tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers the only parameter (site_id) with a description 'Site UUID,' and the description adds no additional meaning. With 100% schema coverage, the baseline is 3, and the description does not enhance parameter understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Get one site,' which clearly indicates a single-site fetch operation. It distinguishes from sibling 'list_sites' by specifying 'one,' but does not differentiate from other 'get_' tools like 'get_site_domain' or 'get_site_banner' beyond the resource type. The purpose is clear but minimal, lacking any nuance about what a site is or its context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description says only 'Get one site' with no mention of contexts, prerequisites, or when to choose this over list_sites or other site-related tools. It provides zero comparative or situational information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.