acedatacloud_disable_auto_recharge

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description does important behavioral work: it discloses that the operation is state-changing, preserves the saved card, and requires confirmation. It does not detail permission requirements or subsequent billing effects, but the key non-obvious behavior is communicated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, each carrying meaning, no filler, and the most important detail comes first. The description is intentionally concise without losing value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the two simple parameters, fully described schema, output schema, and clear sibling context, the description is sufficiently complete. It could explicitly address, but the overall package is adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description is 100% coverage and both parameters already have helpful descriptions. The description adds the requirement that confirmation be true but does not add further meaning beyondthe schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb-object pair ('Disable auto recharge') and distinguishes the tool from its sibling delete_auto_recharge by stating that it does so 'while retaining the saved card' and that confirmation is required.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'while retaining the saved card' provides clear context for when this tool is appropriate versus a deletion tool. It does not explicitly name alternatives or exclusions, but the context is enough to guide selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.