acedatacloud_list_orders

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description is sole source of behavioral info. It implies read-only by listing, but does not explicitly confirm no side effects. Absence of details on rate limits, pagination, or required authentication leaves behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, concise and front-loaded with verb and resource. No superfluous content. Could be slightly more structured with bullet points, but effective as is.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has moderate complexity with 3 optional parameters and an output schema. Description mentions output fields (state, payment method), aiding understanding. However, does not clarify scope (all orders vs filtered) or default ordering, leaving minor gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). Description does not add extra semantics beyond schema, meeting baseline of 3. No enrichment like example values or constraints beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'list' and resource 'recharge orders', including specific fields (state, payment method). It distinguishes from sibling list tools by specifying order type and fields, but does not explicitly contrast with siblings like acedatacloud_list_services.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. With siblings like acedatacloud_create_order and acedatacloud_pay_order, context on whether this is for viewing vs managing orders would help. No prerequisites or exclusions mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.