acedatacloud_quote_auto_recharge

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explicitly states that the operation does not create state, which is a key behavioral trait. It also mentions 'after-discount,' indicating that discounts are applied. No annotations are provided, so this fills the transparency gap well, though it does not discuss permissions or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that conveys the essential information without unnecessary detail or fluff. It is well-structured and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the operation's simplicity (two parameters, clear purpose), the description is sufficient. It explains the purpose and non-mutating nature, and the output schema is present (though not shown), so the description does not need to detail the return structure. It is complete for the context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already describes both parameters (application_id as 'Application UUID' and package_ids as 'One or more package UUIDs'). The description does not add additional meaning about how these parameters affect the quote, so it adds no extra semantic value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: obtaining exact after-discount auto-recharge quotes without creating state. It uses a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('auto-recharge quotes'), distinguishing it from sibling operations like create, update, or delete.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for pre-purchase quotes by stating 'without creating state,' which contrasts with creation operations. It does not explicitly mention alternatives, but the non-mutating nature and the term 'quote' make the use case clear. Minor gap: no direct comparison to similar read-only tools like list_auto_recharges.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.