delete_title
Delete a title from Bexio using its ID. Remove an unwanted title record to keep data accurate.
Instructions
Delete a title
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title_id | Yes | the id of the title |
Delete a title from Bexio using its ID. Remove an unwanted title record to keep data accurate.
Delete a title
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title_id | Yes | the id of the title |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, and the description adds no additional behavioral context such as irreversibility, cascade effects, or permission requirements. It relies entirely on annotations for safety disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short phrase, which is appropriately concise for a simple delete operation. It is not bloated, though it lacks detail that could be useful.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a delete tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimal but omits context about the title entity, potential side effects, and usage scenarios. The combination of schema and annotations covers invocation, but the description itself provides insufficient context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% with title_id documented. The tool description adds no parameter-level information beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline score of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a title' clearly states a delete operation on a title resource, with a specific verb and object. It distinguishes itself from other delete_* siblings by naming the resource, though it doesn't clarify what 'title' refers to in the domain.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor are there any prerequisites or conditions mentioned. The description gives no context for selection among the many sibling tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AIWerk/mcp-server-bexio'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server