create_order_repetition

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description contradicts the annotation title 'Create Order Repetition' by saying 'Edit'. This is an annotation contradiction, and no additional behavioral information (e.g., side effects, state changes, requirements) is disclosed beyond the bare misleading statement.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but this is under-specification rather than effective conciseness. The single sentence fails to convey essential information and does not earn its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a complex tool with nested objects, enums, and no output schema, a one-sentence description is completely inadequate. It lacks any explanation of the repetition formats, constraints, or return behavior, leaving the agent without critical context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description says nothing about the parameters. With a nested 'repetition' object and multiple optional fields (start, end, repetition), the agent receives no guidance beyond raw schema names, which are insufficient for correct usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Edit a repetition' is misleading because the tool name and title indicate 'Create Order Repetition'. The verb 'Edit' contradicts 'create', making the purpose unclear and potentially leading to incorrect invocation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is zero guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'delete_order_repetition' or 'list_order_repetitions'. No context, prerequisites, or examples are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.