delete_manual_entry_file

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the destructive and idempotent nature. The description adds that it removes a 'connection' rather than deleting the underlying file or entry, which is useful. However, it doesn't clarify effects on the linked entities or error behavior; no contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, direct, front-loaded verb, and no redundant words. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete-link tool, the description plus annotations cover the basics. However, it lacks details about whether the file itself remains intact, what happens if the connection doesn't exist, and how entry_id differs from manual_entry_id. The misleading schema description for file_id is not addressed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not explain the roles of manual_entry_id, entry_id, and file_id, and notably file_id's schema description incorrectly says 'the id of the currency', which the description fails to correct.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Delete connection') and resource ('file and manual entry line'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like delete_manual_entry or delete_manual_compound_entry_file. It unambiguously targets the relationship, not the entities themselves.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool vs. alternatives (e.g., delete_manual_entry, delete_manual_compound_entry_file), nor are prerequisites or consequences mentioned. The only hint is implicit in the name and description, which is not enough.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.