list_layers
Retrieve a list of all layers in the current InDesign document to inspect or manage layer structure.
Instructions
List all layers in the document
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve a list of all layers in the current InDesign document to inspect or manage layer structure.
List all layers in the document
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral details (e.g., whether it returns all layers including hidden, order, or structure). The description carries full burden but adds minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no redundancy, front-loaded purpose. Ideal conciseness for a tool with no parameters.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite no parameters, the description lacks completeness regarding return value (e.g., list of names, objects) and does not distinguish from 'get_document_layers'. Output schema absent, so description should compensate but does not.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so baseline is 4 per the rubric. Description adds no parameter info, but none is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'List all layers in the document' with specific verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate from the similar sibling 'get_document_layers', which could cause confusion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_document_layers' or 'create_layer'. Missing context about prerequisites or typical use case.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zachshallbetter/indesign-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server