Skip to main content
Glama

validate_ansible_playbook

Validates Ansible playbook YAML syntax and structure to ensure correctness before execution.

Instructions

Validate Ansible playbook syntax and structure

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
playbookYesAnsible playbook YAML content
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description says 'validate' which is read-only, but annotations have readOnlyHint: false. No additional behavioral context beyond the verb. Does not disclose output format or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no wasted words. Could be slightly more informative without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, so description should explain validation result (e.g., returns boolean or errors). It does not, leaving the agent uncertain about what to expect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% coverage for the single parameter 'playbook' with description 'Ansible playbook YAML content'. Description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema. Baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Validate Ansible playbook syntax and structure' clearly states what the tool does with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like validate_docker_compose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., parse_ansible_inventory). No prerequisites or exclusion criteria provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wrenchpilot/it-tools-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server