decode_jwt
Decode a JWT token to extract its header and payload sections for inspection or debugging.
Instructions
Decode JWT token (header and payload only)
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| token | Yes | JWT token to decode |
Decode a JWT token to extract its header and payload sections for inspection or debugging.
Decode JWT token (header and payload only)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| token | Yes | JWT token to decode |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description does not address that the tool does not verify token signatures or that it only decodes without side effects, despite readOnlyHint=false suggesting possible state changes.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence that conveys the core purpose without unnecessary words, though it could be slightly more structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter tool, the description is adequate but lacks details about output format and the fact that signature verification is not performed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema covers the parameter completely, and the description adds no additional semantics for the token parameter beyond the schema's own description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb (decode), resource (JWT token), and scope (header and payload only), distinguishing it from other decode tools like decode_base64 or decode_url.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as decode_base64 for individual JWT components, nor any exclusion criteria for invalid tokens.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wrenchpilot/it-tools-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server