cat
Display file contents directly in the terminal. Reads and outputs text from a specified file path.
Instructions
Display content of a file
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| file | Yes | File path |
Display file contents directly in the terminal. Reads and outputs text from a specified file path.
Display content of a file
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| file | Yes | File path |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false, which may suggest potential side effects, but description does not clarify if cat modifies files. No mention of limitations like binary files or large files.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise and front-loaded, but could add a note about output without losing brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema exists, and description omits return value details (e.g., prints to stdout). Adequate for a simple tool but lacks full context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema already describes 'file' as 'File path' with 100% coverage; description adds no extra meaning beyond repeating the tool's purpose.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'display' and resource 'content of a file', distinguishing it from siblings like grep, head, tail.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use cat versus alternatives (e.g., head, tail, grep). No prerequisites, exclusions, or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wrenchpilot/it-tools-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server