encode_html
Convert special characters in text to HTML entities to prevent code injection and ensure safe rendering in web pages.
Instructions
Encode HTML entities
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | Yes | Text to HTML encode |
Convert special characters in text to HTML entities to prevent code injection and ensure safe rendering in web pages.
Encode HTML entities
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | Yes | Text to HTML encode |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations only provide readOnlyHint: false, which implies modification but the description adds no details about behavior, side effects, or return values.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence, no extraneous information. Highly concise and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With one simple parameter and no output schema, the description is minimal but leaves out specifics about which HTML entities are encoded (e.g., only basic ones like <>&"' or all). Adequate for a simple tool but could be more complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of the parameter 'text' with a description 'Text to HTML encode'. The tool description adds no further meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Encode HTML entities' clearly states the action (encode) and the target (HTML entities), distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'decode_html'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as 'encode_html_entities'. No when-not or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wrenchpilot/it-tools-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server