Actualizar permiso

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It only states the basic action without disclosing side effects, idempotency, validation rules, or error behavior (e.g., if the permission does not exist). This is insufficient for understanding the tool's full behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no redundant words. It is well-structured and directly states the purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool lacks an output schema, annotations, and a detailed description. It does not mention required fields beyond the schema, the meaning of optional fields, expected return values, or error handling. This is not enough for an agent to confidently invoke the tool in various scenarios.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Of the four parameters in the schema, only 'id' has a description. The description of the tool itself adds no additional meaning for 'name', 'extra', or 'description'. Parameter semantics are therefore largely under-specified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (updates permission data) with a specific verb and object, distinguishing it from create/delete siblings. However, it lacks any context about the scope or implications of the update.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The usage is implied by the name 'update_permission' and the action 'Actualiza', but there is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus create_permission or delete_permission. The description provides no alternatives or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.