Obtener revisión del tenant

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the behavioral disclosure burden. The word 'Devuelve' implies a read-only operation, which is minimal transparency, but it does not state possible errors, token requirements, or what 'revisión/configuración' precisely entails. It is acceptable but thin.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence that directly states the tool's purpose with no filler or redundant content. It is appropriately sized for such a simple zero-parameter operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter getter, the description gives the core return topic but omits the concrete shape of the response and is ambiguous next to sibling tools that seem to overlap (get_tenant_settings, get_active_tenant). Given the absence of an output schema, more details about what exactly the configuration includes would be needed for a higher score.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the no-parameter baseline of 4 applies. The description does not need to compensate for missing schema documentation since there is nothing to document.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Devuelve la revisión/configuración del tenant del token.' It is clear about the general action, but it does not differentiate from sibling tools like get_tenant_settings or get_active_tenant, which also deal with tenant information.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention related siblings, prerequisites, or situations where another tool would be more appropriate, leaving the agent to infer selection solely from the name and short description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.