Crear o actualizar scope propio

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, and the description gives no information about side effects, authorization checks, error conditions, or return behavior. The phrase 'si es owner' hints at a permission requirement but does not explain what happens if the user is not the owner.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely brief, which aids readability but sacrifices necessary detail. It lacks any structured explanation of the operation's logic or conditions, making it feel incomplete rather than concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the existence of separate create_scope and update_scope tools, this save_scope tool likely serves as an upsert convenience. However, the description does not explain how it relates to those siblings, when to prefer it, or what constraints apply. This makes the tool ambiguous within the broader context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides basic descriptions for id, name, users, and description, but the tool description adds little beyond restating 'negocio'. The 'extra' parameter remains unexplained, and relationships between parameters (e.g., how id differs for create vs update) are not clarified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb ('creates or updates') and resource ('scope'), but it does not define when to create versus update, nor does it clarify what 'scope propio' and 'si es owner' mean. This leaves ambiguity about the exact operation, especially given sibling tools like create_scope and update_scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool instead of create_scope or update_scope. The description does not mention any selection criteria, prerequisites, or context that would help an agent decide between this and the more specific sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.