mcp-polizei
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-polizei
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-capable clients to inspect and manage Keycloak realms, users, clients, roles, and groups with layered security modes, realm allowlisting, protected realms, delete gating, dry-run, and audit logging.862 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables management of Scaleway IAM (applications, API keys, policies, permission sets) and Object Storage bucket policies through an MCP server.11715 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables administration of Keycloak identity and access management through MCP, allowing management of realms, clients, users, roles, groups, identity providers, and sessions from any MCP client.56 npmApache 2.0

clue2app-user-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceExposes user, membership, and role administration tools via MCP, acting as a thin passthrough to a coordinator API with RBAC enforced by the coordinator using caller bearer tokens.8Academic Free v1.1- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients like Claude Code or Codex to administer a Bifrost LLM gateway's governance API, including virtual keys, teams, customers, budgets, provider configs, routing rules, model/pricing config, request-log observability, and core gateway config.5 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables managing and observing Technitium DNS Server through MCP, including read-only or read-write tool surfaces, scoped bearer authentication, audit logging, and confirmation gates for destructive operations.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 55 tools
Many tools have overlapping purposes, such as list_available_tenants vs list_tenants, list_oauth_scopes vs list_oauth_client_scopes, delete_scope vs delete_scope_own, and add_user_to_scope vs create_user. Even with descriptive notes, the high number of similarly named tools creates significant ambiguity.
Naming mixes conventions: list_* vs get_*, create_* vs save_*, update_* vs set_* vs change_*, plus import, assign, remove, reject. Also, 'scope' and 'tenant' are used interchangeably, further breaking consistency.
With 55 tools, the surface is overwhelming and far beyond typical scopes. The excessive count makes it impractical to browse and increases selection errors.
While covering many identity operations, there are notable gaps: no get_user (only list/search), no update_invitation, no direct user-permission assignment, and no get_role/get_permission by id. The large tool count does not correspond to complete lifecycle coverage.