Skip to main content
Glama
williamamed

mcp-polizei

by williamamed

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-polizei

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable clients to inspect and manage Keycloak realms, users, clients, roles, and groups with layered security modes, realm allowlisting, protected realms, delete gating, dry-run, and audit logging.
      8
      62 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables administration of Keycloak identity and access management through MCP, allowing management of realms, clients, users, roles, groups, identity providers, and sessions from any MCP client.
      56 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes user, membership, and role administration tools via MCP, acting as a thin passthrough to a coordinator API with RBAC enforced by the coordinator using caller bearer tokens.
      8
      Academic Free v1.1
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients like Claude Code or Codex to administer a Bifrost LLM gateway's governance API, including virtual keys, teams, customers, budgets, provider configs, routing rules, model/pricing config, request-log observability, and core gateway config.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables managing and observing Technitium DNS Server through MCP, including read-only or read-write tool surfaces, scoped bearer authentication, audit logging, and confirmation gates for destructive operations.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.5/5.0

    Scored across 55 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping purposes, such as list_available_tenants vs list_tenants, list_oauth_scopes vs list_oauth_client_scopes, delete_scope vs delete_scope_own, and add_user_to_scope vs create_user. Even with descriptive notes, the high number of similarly named tools creates significant ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming mixes conventions: list_* vs get_*, create_* vs save_*, update_* vs set_* vs change_*, plus import, assign, remove, reject. Also, 'scope' and 'tenant' are used interchangeably, further breaking consistency.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 55 tools, the surface is overwhelming and far beyond typical scopes. The excessive count makes it impractical to browse and increases selection errors.

    Completeness2/5

    While covering many identity operations, there are notable gaps: no get_user (only list/search), no update_invitation, no direct user-permission assignment, and no get_role/get_permission by id. The large tool count does not correspond to complete lifecycle coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues