Importar permisos

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden, yet it only states the action without disclosing side effects, such as whether existing permissions are overwritten, whether partial failures occur, or what permissions are required. The behavior is essentially a black box beyond the high-level import action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the primary action and includes the most important parameter note. No unnecessary words or redundancy are present.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description does not explain the expected structure of the 'items' array objects, nor does it mention any output or response behavior. Given the nested object schema and lack of output schema, an agent would have insufficient context to construct valid inputs or understand results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Two of three parameters (items and idScope) have descriptions in the schema, and the tool description adds crucial context for idScope (0 uses token's tenant). However, 'extra' is completely undescribed, leaving its purpose ambiguous. The moderate coverage and the idScope explanation justify a mid-range score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool imports a batch of permissions into a scope, using the specific verb 'imports' and identifying the object and target. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like create_permission and list_permissions by emphasizing the batch nature and the special idScope semantics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for bulk permission imports but does not explicitly contrast with single-permission tools or list-permission tools. It provides a useful note about idScope=0 but lacks explicit guidance on when to choose this over alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.