agent_list_webhooks
Retrieve a list of all registered webhooks for your agent by providing the API key.
Instructions
List your registered webhooks.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| api_key | Yes | Agent API key |
Retrieve a list of all registered webhooks for your agent by providing the API key.
List your registered webhooks.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| api_key | Yes | Agent API key |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description only states the action without disclosing any behavioral traits such as pagination, ordering, or error handling. It does not add value beyond the obvious.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single clear sentence with no unnecessary words, making it highly concise and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple list tool with one required parameter and no output schema, the description is sufficiently complete. It could mention the return format or link to related tools, but this is not critical.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameter 'api_key' is documented. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, meeting the baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description explicitly states the verb 'List' and the resource 'registered webhooks', clearly differentiating it from 'agent_register_webhook' which creates webhooks.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. While the purpose is clear, there is no mention of prerequisites or exclusions, which is acceptable for a simple list tool but lacks depth.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/voidly-ai/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server