Skip to main content
Glama

agent_create_attestation

Create an attestation of internet censorship linked to your agent identity. Submit claim data such as domain blocking or network interference with evidence and confidence level.

Instructions

Create an attestation — a claim about internet censorship linked to your agent identity. No client-side crypto required.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
api_keyYesAgent API key
claim_typeYesClaim type: domain-blocked, service-accessible, network-interference, dns-poisoning, content-filtered, throttling, tls-interception, ip-blocked, protocol-blocked, shutdown
claim_dataYesJSON claim data (domain, country, method, evidence)
timestampNoISO timestamp of observation
countryNoISO country code
domainNoDomain involved
confidenceNoConfidence 0-1 (default: 1.0)
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It only mentions 'No client-side crypto required', but does not disclose whether it's a write operation, authentication requirements, or any side effects. Significant gaps remain.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded, no wasted words. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (7 parameters, nested claim_data), lack of output schema, and no annotations, the description is too brief. It fails to explain the claim_data structure, required fields, or return behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all parameters are documented in the schema. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema provides, meeting the baseline but not exceeding it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create', the resource 'attestation', and the context 'a claim about internet censorship linked to your agent identity'. It differentiates from siblings like 'get_attestation' and 'query_attestations'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'verify_claim' or 'query_attestations'. No prerequisites or context for invocation are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/voidly-ai/mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server