Redirect Create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are supplied, so the description carries the full burden of disclosure. It confirms a mutation ('Create') but says nothing about required permissions, how duplicate sources are handled, what the default 301 status implies, or whether the source must be a unique path. For a write tool with zero annotation coverage this is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The single sentence is front-loaded and free of padding, but it is under-specified rather than genuinely concise. There is no wasted wording, yet the sentence does not earn its place by conveying anything beyond the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be described, but the mutation semantics, the six undocumented parameters, and the required source/target relationship are all left to the agent. For a create tool with no annotations, this is not complete enough to call safely.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Six parameters with 0% schema description coverage and no param guidance in the description. Nothing explains that redirect_source/redirect_redirect are the required source/target pair, what status_code=301 versus other codes means, or what the opaque *_options objects accept.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Create a new redirect'), so an agent knows exactly what the tool does. However, it offers no differentiation from the closely named sibling redirect_bulk_create, nor any hint at the underlying entity model (path alias redirects with source/target).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of the alternative siblings (redirect_bulk_create for many at once, redirect_update for modifying an existing one). The agent must infer selection from the tool names alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.