Content Translation Enable

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does not disclose that this is a configuration mutation, whether it is reversible, what happens to existing translations, or any permission requirements — significant gaps for a toggling tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single efficient sentence with the action front-loaded. It is compact but arguably too terse to serve the tool's complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations, 0% parameter coverage, and side-effect implications (enabling translation alters site configuration), the description is too thin. An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, but behavioral context is still missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description's 'entity type/bundle' phrasing maps to the two parameters and clarifies that bundle is subordinate to entity_type. That said, it says nothing about the null/default behavior of bundle or acceptable values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Enable) and resource (content translation) scoped to entity type/bundle, so the agent knows the operation. However, it does not differentiate itself from neighboring tools like translation_add, translation_update, or translation_status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance and no named alternatives. The description gives no indication of whether this is a one-time setup step versus a per-entity operation, or how it relates to translation_add/translation_status.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.