Block Place

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It does not say whether placement requires specific permissions, whether it is idempotent, what happens to an existing block already in that region, or how weight affects ordering — only a bare statement of action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no wasted words, which is structurally clean. But for a three-parameter mutation tool it is undersized to the point of under-specification rather than genuine conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need not be explained, but with zero annotations and zero parameter documentation the description is not complete enough for an agent to invoke a mutating block operation confidently.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It names 'region' and 'weight' but adds no meaning (e.g., that weight is a delta/ordering value where lower sorts first) and never mentions 'block_id' at all, leaving the key required parameter undefined.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Place') and resource ('block') plus a scoping context ('in a region'). However, it does not distinguish this from the many sibling block tools (block_create, block_update, block_get, block_region_list), so an agent cannot tell whether 'place' means create, assign, or reorder a block.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of alternatives such as block_create or block_update. The agent is left to infer the scenario entirely from the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.