Jsonapi Include Optimize

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. 'Get' weakly implies a read, but nothing explains what 'optimize' actually does, whether it hits the network/schema, whether it caches, or what inputs it needs — all meaningful for a tool whose whole purpose is an optimization decision.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single front-loaded sentence with no filler, which is good, but it is under-specified rather than genuinely concise — the brevity reflects missing content, not tight writing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return format need not be described. Still, for a tool with two required, undocumented parameters and a fuzzy 'optimization' concept, the description omits the when-to-use context and parameter meaning an agent needs to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% across two required parameters. The phrase 'for entity type' loosely maps to entity_type, but the includes array — the core input — is unexplained in both schema and description, so the agent gets no help on what to pass.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a verb ('Get') and a resource ('optimized include paths') scoped 'for entity type', so the general intent is legible. However, 'optimized' is undefined jargon and the description does nothing to distinguish it from siblings like jsonapi_schema_get, jsonapi_sparse_fieldsets, or jsonapi_resources_list, leaving the agent to guess what value it returns.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool, when not to, or what it replaces. Given several sibling JSON:API tools with overlapping-sounding purposes, the absence of any routing context is a clear gap.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.