Create User

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, yet "Create a user account" discloses nothing about required permissions, uniqueness constraints on mail, how pass_/roles/status are handled, or side effects. Like the update_drive calibration, the verb implies mutation but nothing further is stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded verb+resource sentence with no filler. It is efficient, but its brevity reflects under-specification rather than disciplined conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a five-parameter mutation tool with no annotations and 0% parameter coverage, this is far too thin. The output schema covers return values, but the input side and safe-usage context are completely absent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Five parameters with 0% schema description coverage, and the description mentions none of them. The required mail/name plus the ambiguous pass_ (trailing underscore), roles, and status are left entirely unexplained in both schema and description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb and resource ("Create a user account"), which is clear and non-tautological. However, it offers no differentiation from siblings like create_node or update_user, and the agent gets no signal about why it would pick this over the many related user tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternative guidance at all. With siblings such as get_user_by_email, assign_role, and block_user nearby, the description gives the agent nothing to route against.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.