coda_create_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate a write operation (readOnlyHint=false). The description adds behavioral context beyond annotations by stating that pack formulas cannot be inserted and that pages are created at top level unless parent_page_id is specified. This is useful for the agent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with 5 sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, and every sentence adds value. No redundant or vague statements.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema exists, the description correctly omits return details. It covers creation behavior, optional content, and nesting. However, it lacks information on error conditions, permission requirements, or uniqueness constraints, which would be helpful for a creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description restates some schema info (e.g., content_format for HTML/markdown) but adds no new per-parameter semantics beyond a general note about pack formulas. It does not enhance understanding of each parameter beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'create' and resource 'page', and distinguishes from siblings like coda_create_doc and coda_create_folder by specifying it creates a page within a doc. Additional details about optional content and nesting further clarify the purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for creating a new page but provides no explicit guidance on when not to use it or how to choose between alternatives like coda_update_page. The mention of top-level vs nested creation gives some context, but lacks comparative guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.