Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-coda

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides 15 core tools for managing Coda documents, tables, and rows through HTTP, SSE, and stdio transports. It is specifically optimized for stability with LangSmith Agent Builder and supports document manipulation, data retrieval, and formula execution.
      15
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to discover and use tools for saving and retrieving code snippets, semantic code search, generating style guides, building wiki documentation, and orchestrating multi-agent documentation workflows.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to discover and invoke tools for saving and retrieving code snippets, generating language-specific style guides and deep wiki documentation, and orchestrating multi-agent documentation workflows backed by semantic vector search.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to discover and invoke tools for saving and retrieving code snippets, generating style guides and wiki documentation, and orchestrating multi-agent documentation workflows with semantic search.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 54 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources and actions, and list/get pairs plus analytics summary vs per-item tools are clarified in descriptions. Minor confusion possible between coda_get_page_content/coda_export_page and among several analytics endpoints, but descriptions largely guide selection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a coda_ prefix and snake_case, overwhelmingly following a verb_noun pattern (e.g., coda_create_doc, coda_list_rows, coda_delete_permission). The few domain-specific names like coda_whoami still fit the overall convention.

    Tool Count2/5

    54 tools is well above the 25+ threshold for 'too many' and risks overwhelming an agent. While each maps to a distinct Coda API operation, consolidation of analytics summaries and CRUD families could reduce the surface without losing coverage.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers docs, folders, pages, tables, rows, columns, permissions, analytics, and publishing lifecycles thoroughly. Minor gaps like comments or webhook tools may exist, but core CRUD and administrative operations are well represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive