itglue_update_flexible_asset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description is responsible for behavioral disclosure. It does disclose the partial update behavior, but does not mention idempotency, error handling, or required permissions. Adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that efficiently conveys the purpose and key usage detail without extraneous words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description covers the basic update behavior, but lacks details on return values, error states, or required preconditions. Adequate for a simple update tool but could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema provides full descriptions for both parameters (100% coverage). The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already states, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Update' and the resource 'flexible asset', distinguishing it from create, delete, and get operations. It explicitly mentions partial update behavior, which differentiates it from related tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description specifies that the ID and traits to change are required, and that other trait keys remain untouched. While it doesn't explicitly state when not to use this tool, the guidance is clear for a partial update scenario.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.