itglue_bulk_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses merge semantics (omitted attributes untouched), batch size limit, return format (succeeded[]/failed[]), and destructive nature with required confirm token, covering key behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is four concise sentences with no unnecessary words. The main action is front-loaded, and each sentence adds essential information without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description adequately covers return values (succeeded[]/failed[]), constraints (max 50 items, confirm token), and behavioral semantics, providing a complete picture for agent usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (baseline 3). The description adds value by clarifying the merge behavior for the 'attributes' parameter, which goes beyond the schema's 'additionalProperties: true'. The confirm token requirement is reiterated but already in schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Update multiple resources of the same type in one call', with a specific verb and resource. It also mentions JSON:API merge semantics, clearly distinguishing from bulk delete and individual update siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for batch updates of the same resource type and notes the limit of 50 items. It does not explicitly exclude cases or name alternatives, but the context makes it clear when to use this tool over individual updates.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.