itglue_publish_document

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry behavioral information. It discloses that the operation is destructive and requires a confirm parameter, but it does not elaborate on side effects, permissions, or what happens to previous versions. The term 'destructive' may be slightly misleading since it makes a draft visible rather than deleting data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences. The first sentence states the purpose, and the second adds critical behavioral context. Every sentence is useful, and there is no redundancy or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has two parameters and no output schema, the description covers the main purpose and safety requirement. However, it does not explain the return value or outcome on success (e.g., confirmation of publication). It is adequate but not fully detailed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already described. The description adds context for the id parameter by linking it to the document being published, but it essentially repeats the confirm parameter's purpose. It provides no new semantic detail beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Publish a document (makes the latest draft visible)', using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like itglue_create_document or itglue_delete_document, which have different purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates that the operation is destructive and requires a confirmation token, signaling a safety mechanism. While it does not explicitly compare to alternatives, the context of sibling tools makes it clear that this is for publishing a document, not creating or updating.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.