update-database-service

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description is extremely minimal, stating only that it updates a database service. It does not disclose any behavioral traits such as idempotency, side effects, required permissions, or what aspects of the service are updated. No annotations are provided to compensate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and gets straight to the point with no extraneous words. It could be improved by adding more detail without being verbose, but it is efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that there is no output schema and no annotations, the description is too brief. It does not explain what a database service is, what the update entails, or how to use the JSON Patch format. The sibling list is large, but no context is provided to help choose this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters. The description adds the term 'JSON Patch', which reinforces the format of the operations parameter but does not provide additional semantics beyond what the schema already states.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (Update), the resource (a database service), and the method (using JSON Patch). It distinguishes this tool from siblings like update-table or update-database by specifying the resource and the update technique.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus other update tools (e.g., update-database, update-table). There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or when JSON Patch is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.