Delete Comment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds behavior beyond the destructiveHint annotation by noting the operation is conditional ('if any') and that it returns a JSON confirmation. This helps an agent understand the tool's effect even when no comment exists, though it does not specify the exact confirmation structure or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and well-structured, with labeled Args and Returns sections. Every sentence carries information without unnecessary fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple three-parameter tool, the description covers the necessary inputs and return type. The only gap is the lack of detail about the JSON confirmation structure and potential edge cases (e.g., error when no comment exists), but this is minor for such a straightforward operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description fully compensates by explaining each parameter (workbook, sheet, cell) including defaults, types, and an example for cell. This is essential and well done.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (delete), the resource (a comment on a specific cell), and the conditional nature ('if any'). This distinguishes it from siblings like add_comment and get_comments without ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as checking for an existing comment with get_comments first. There is no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use, and no mention of related tools or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.