Skip to main content
Glama
trendsmcp-ai

news-sentiment-mcp

news-sentiment-mcp

News Sentiment MCP Works with Claude Works with Cursor

AI를 위한 뉴스 감성 및 볼륨 데이터 뉴스가 특정 주제를 어떻게 다루고 있는지, 그리고 그 보도가 긍정적인지 부정적인지 이해하세요. 감성 점수, 미디어 볼륨 추세, 과거 보도 데이터가 AI 분석에 적합한 구조로 제공됩니다.

전체 문서 및 라이브 데모: https://trendsmcp.ai/news-sentiment-data

**Trends MCP**의 일부 – 12개 이상의 소스에서 실시간 트렌드 데이터를 제공하는 MCP 서버입니다. 메인 리포지토리: https://github.com/trendsmcp/trends-mcp


2단계로 시작하기

1단계: **trendsmcp.ai**에서 무료 API 키를 받으세요. 하루 100회 요청, 신용카드 필요 없음.

2단계: AI 클라이언트에 추가 (YOUR_API_KEY를 교체하세요):

+ Cursor에 추가 (원클릭)

Cursor / Windsurf / Cline   (~/.cursor/mcp.json 또는 동일)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "trends-mcp": {
      "url": "https://api.trendsmcp.ai/mcp",
      "transport": "http",
      "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" }
    }
  }
}

VS Code / GitHub Copilot   (.vscode/mcp.json)

{
  "servers": {
    "trends-mcp": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://api.trendsmcp.ai/mcp",
      "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" }
    }
  }
}

Claude Desktop   (claude_desktop_config.json) 사용자 → 설정 → 개발자 → 설정 편집 — mcpServers 안에 추가

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "trends-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote",
        "https://api.trendsmcp.ai/mcp",
        "--header",
        "Authorization:${AUTH_HEADER}"
      ],
      "env": {
        "AUTH_HEADER": "Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"
      }
    }
  }
}

Claude.ai (브라우저)   설정 -> 커넥터 -> 사용자 지정 커넥터 추가:

https://api.trendsmcp.ai/mcp

Related MCP server: news-volume-mcp

예시 질의

연결한 후 AI에게 다음과 같이 물어보세요:

get_growth(keyword='tesla', source='news sentiment, news volume', percent_growth=['3M'])

사용 가능한 도구

도구

기능 설명

get_trends

이 소스에서 키워드에 대한 시계열 데이터

get_growth

1주, 1개월, 3개월, 6개월, 1년 기간의 성장률(%)

get_top_trends

현재 이 소스에서 트렌드 중인 주제

get_ranked_trends

볼륨 기준으로 정렬된 인기 주제


FAQ

두 가지 신호: 뉴스 볼륨(주제가 얼마나 많은 보도를 받고 있는지)과 뉴스 감성(해당 보도가 긍정적, 중립적, 부정적 중 어느 쪽에 치우쳐 있는지)입니다. 두 신호 모두 정규화되어 시계열로 제공됩니다.

감성은 어떻게 점수화되나요?

감성은 뉴스 기사 제목과 요약에 대한 NLP 분석을 통해 도출되며, -1(매우 부정적)에서 +1(매우 긍정적)까지의 척도로 점수가 매겨집니다. Trends MCP는 일관성을 위해 이를 0-100 척도로 정규화합니다.

실적 발표 기간 동안 특정 회사의 감성을 추적할 수 있나요?

네. 회사 이름이나 티커를 질의하면 감성 시계열이 실적 발표, 제품 출시, 규제 이벤트 전후에 미디어 어조가 어떻게 변화했는지 보여줍니다.

어떤 뉴스 소스가 포함되나요?

주요 영어 뉴스 매체, 금융 미디어, 기술 전문지가 포함됩니다. 신호는 개별 매체를 추적하지 않고 여러 소스를 종합합니다.


모든 데이터 소스

Trends MCP는 하나의 연결로 12개 이상의 소스를 다룹니다: Google 검색, YouTube, TikTok, Reddit, Amazon, Wikipedia, 뉴스 감성, 웹 트래픽, 앱 다운로드, Steam, npm 등.

전체 보기: https://trendsmcp.ai/data-sources


Python 클라이언트로도 사용 가능

동일한 API 키가 Python에서도 직접 작동합니다. MCP 호스트가 필요하지 않습니다.

pip install news-sentiment-mcp
import os
from news_sentiment_mcp import TrendsMcpClient, SOURCE

client = TrendsMcpClient(api_key=os.environ["TRENDSMCP_API_KEY"])

series  = client.get_trends(source=SOURCE, keyword="your keyword")
growth  = client.get_growth(source=SOURCE, keyword="your keyword", percent_growth=["1M", "3M", "12M"])
top     = client.get_top_trends(type="News Sentiment", limit=10)

전체 Python 문서: trendsmcp.ai/docs

라이선스

MIT © Trends MCP

Available Tools

3 tools
get_growthA
Read-onlyIdempotent
Inspect

Point-to-point growth for a keyword on one or more sources. Each window is a preset string (12M, 3M, YTD, and the other listed periods). Values are on a 0-100 scale, plus absolute volume when available. Prefer this over get_time_series for growth questions. app downloads and app rankings are keyword sources (Android bundle ID). They are not the App Store / Google Play live boards on get_top_trends. If the request is rate limited or the monthly quota is used up, tell the user their plan limit is reached.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sourceYesOne source, or comma-separated sources (e.g. 'amazon, tiktok, youtube'). Valid: 'google search', 'google images', 'google news', 'google shopping', 'youtube', 'wikipedia', 'tiktok', 'reddit', 'amazon', 'news sentiment', 'news volume', 'npm', 'python', 'steam', 'app downloads', 'app rankings'.
keywordYesWhat to look up. The string format is required by source. Standard sources (google search, google images, google news, google shopping, youtube, wikipedia, tiktok, reddit, amazon, news sentiment, news volume): any name or phrase, e.g. 'nike'. npm: exact npmjs.com package name, case-sensitive. Right: 'react', '@babel/core'. Wrong: 'React', 'React.js'. python: exact PyPI project name. Right: 'pandas', 'requests'. Wrong: 'Pandas'. steam: game display name in plain English, not a Steam App ID. Right: 'Elden Ring', 'CS2'. First Steam store search result wins, so use an unambiguous name. app downloads and app rankings: Android bundle ID only (the id= value on Google Play). Right: 'com.openai.chatgpt', 'com.whatsapp'. Wrong: 'ChatGPT', 'WhatsApp', an iOS App Store ID, or a bundle ID that is not Android. Find it at play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=THIS_PART. If the request includes app downloads or app rankings with other sources, keyword must still be the Android bundle ID.
percent_growthNoGrowth windows. Default if omitted: ['12M']. Each item must be a preset string: '7D', '1W', '14D', '2W', '30D', '1M', '2M', '3M', '6M', '9M', '12M', '1Y', '18M', '24M', '2Y', '36M', '3Y', '48M', '4Y', '60M', '5Y', 'MTD', 'QTD', 'YTD'. Every preset is a two-date comparison.

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
resultYes

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, and idempotentHint annotations, the description adds useful behavioral context: values are on a 0-100 scale with absolute volume when available, and the agent should tell the user their plan limit is reached on rate limiting or quota exhaustion. These details are not present in the structured fields and do not contradict the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and every sentence earns its place: core operation, output scale, sibling preference, app-source caveat, and rate-limit handling. It front-loads the primary purpose and avoids redundant phrasing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With a detailed input schema, an output schema, and safety annotations, the description fills the remaining gaps: tool selection, output scale, source disambiguation, and error behavior. It is complete enough for an agent to invoke the tool correctly without further inference.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents all parameters thoroughly, including valid sources, keyword formatting rules per source, and every preset growth window. The description references preset windows and Android bundle IDs but does not add meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific action and resource: 'Point-to-point growth for a keyword on one or more sources.' It also names sibling tools to disambiguate itself, stating it is preferred over get_time_series for growth questions and clarifying that app sources are not the live boards on get_top_trends.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives an explicit selection rule: 'Prefer this over get_time_series for growth questions.' It also warns against confusing app downloads/app rankings with get_top_trends live boards, and specifies how to handle rate limits or quota exhaustion. This gives the agent clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_time_seriesA
Read-onlyIdempotent
Inspect

Full historical series for one keyword and one source (0-100 values, plus volume when available). Use for charting or custom math. Not for live 'what's trending now' boards (use get_top_trends). For most growth questions, use get_growth. If the request is rate limited or the monthly quota is used up, tell the user their plan limit is reached.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sourceYesExactly one source per request. Valid: 'google search', 'google images', 'google news', 'google shopping', 'youtube', 'wikipedia', 'tiktok', 'reddit', 'amazon', 'news sentiment', 'news volume', 'npm', 'python', 'steam', 'app downloads', 'app rankings'.
keywordYesWhat to look up. The string format is required by source. Standard sources (google search, google images, google news, google shopping, youtube, wikipedia, tiktok, reddit, amazon, news sentiment, news volume): any name or phrase, e.g. 'tesla'. npm: exact npmjs.com package name, case-sensitive. Right: 'react', '@babel/core'. Wrong: 'React', 'React.js'. python: exact PyPI project name. Right: 'pandas', 'requests'. Wrong: 'Pandas'. steam: game display name in plain English, not a Steam App ID. Right: 'Elden Ring', 'CS2'. First Steam store search result wins, so use an unambiguous name. app downloads and app rankings: Android bundle ID only (the id= value on Google Play). Right: 'com.openai.chatgpt', 'com.whatsapp'. Wrong: 'ChatGPT', 'WhatsApp', an iOS App Store ID, or a bundle ID that is not Android. Find it at play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=THIS_PART.

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
resultYes

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover readOnlyHint and idempotentHint. The description adds behavioral context beyond those hints: the 0-100 value range, volume availability, and rate-limit/quota handling instructions. This provides useful operational detail that annotations do not convey, though the core safety profile is already covered by hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, each earning its place: purpose and scope, usage routing, and error handling. Front-loaded with the core purpose; no repetition or fluff. The alternative tool routing is included efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given a two-parameter tool with a full output schema, the description covers purpose, usage scenarios, alternatives, and error handling. An agent has all necessary information to decide when to call it and what to expect, with no critical gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and both parameters have detailed, source-specific descriptions (e.g., keyword format per source, valid source list). The tool description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond restating 'one keyword and one source', so the baseline for full schema coverage applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states it returns 'Full historical series for one keyword and one source' with a value range and volume detail. It distinguishes itself from siblings get_top_trends and get_growth by stating what it is not for (live trending, growth questions), making the tool's purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Directly states when to use it: 'Use for charting or custom math' and when not to: 'Not for live trending (use get_top_trends)' and 'For most growth questions, use get_growth'. Also provides explicit handling for rate-limited or quota-exhausted requests, which is actionable guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 3 tool updatesv0.1.0
    • First observedget_growth
    • First observedget_time_series
    • First observedget_top_trends

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation4/5

The three tools are mostly distinct: get_growth answers point-to-point growth questions, get_time_series provides full historical data, and get_top_trends handles live boards. Descriptions explicitly steer usage away from confusion, though get_growth and get_time_series do overlap somewhat for the same keyword/source data.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow the same get_ prefix and describe their primary output with a clear noun: growth, time_series, top_trends. This is predictable and easy to navigate.

Tool Count3/5

Three tools is on the low end of the acceptable range and feels slightly thin for what the server name implies. It is a reasonable number for a narrow trends/growth API, but the mismatch with 'news-sentiment' makes the scope feel underbuilt.

Completeness2/5

Despite the server name including 'sentiment', there is no tool for sentiment analysis, news article retrieval, or sentiment scoring. The current surface only covers growth, historical series, and trending boards, leaving major expected functionality absent.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables users to query news mention volume time series, growth percentages, and live Google News feeds as an MCP tool, integrating with AI hosts like Claude and Cursor.
    3
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to search real-time and archived news from 300,000+ sources across 177 countries and 59 languages, with filters for sentiment, entities, categories, and more, plus taxonomy suggestion for precise queries.
    MIT