create_memory

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds context that memories store translation units for reuse, implying future use. Annotations already indicate it is not read-only and not destructive. The param external_id's description in schema adds initialization behavior, but main description lacks side-effect details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two front-loaded sentences: first for core action, second for context. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple and has an output schema for return values. However, the description misses contextual details like prerequisites (e.g., account setup) or usage notes for external_id. Adequate but not enriched.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 50% (only external_id has description). The main description does not elaborate on the name parameter, which is required. It only mentions 'custom name' in passing, failing to compensate for the gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a translation memory with a custom name in Lara Translate account, using specific verb and resource. It explains what translation memories are, but does not explicitly distinguish from sibling tools like create_glossary.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create_glossary) or under what conditions (e.g., need for a memory vs glossary). The description is purely functional.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.