Skip to main content
Glama

List Allowed Domains

list_allowed_domains
Read-onlyIdempotent

List allowed domains for a Wistia account to verify which sites may embed your media. Supports paging, sorting, and read-only API tokens.

Instructions

Lists allowed domains belonging to the account.

Requires api token with one of the following permissions

Read all data

Tokens with the "Act with a team member's permissions" permission (all:delegate_to_contact_permissions scope) can also be used. Requests made with such a token are authorized using the permissions of the contact assigned to the token. Read-only account operation.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoThe page number to retrieve. This cannot be combined with `cursor`, pagination.
cursorNoIf `cursor[enabled]` is set to 1 then cursor pagination is enabled and the first set of records are fetched up to the `per_page`. Cursor pagination will also be turned on if `cursor[before]` or `cursor[after]` are set. Records returned will have a `cursor` property set which can be used to fetch more records in the same `sort_by` ordering. The cursor value of the last record can be used to fetch records after the current result set and the cursor of the first record can be used to fetch records before the result set. NOTE: a cursor value is only valid if the `sort_by` value hasn't changed from the last fetch. For example, you cannot fetch using `sort_by` id and then pass that cursor value to a `sort_by` name.
accountNoNamed private Wistia account; selects credentials, not a remote account ID.
sort_byNoOrdering. When using cursor pagination (see cursor param), only `id` and `domain` are supported. id
per_pageNoThe number of medias per page. Use this for both offset pagination and cursor pagination.
all_pagesNoRead bounded page/per_page pages; each request consumes API quota. Not a snapshot or guaranteed complete backup.
max_itemsNoMaximum returned records with all_pages=true, default 1000. At most 100 requests; output includes continuation state.
sort_directionNoOrdering Sort Direction (0 = desc, 1 = asc; default is 1)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv2.0.0

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint/idempotentHint/destructiveHint=false, so the description is not the primary safety signal. It goes beyond them, however, by disclosing the exact required token permission and the delegate-to-contact behavior of scoped tokens, which is real operational context an agent cannot derive from structured fields.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose sentence is front-loaded and the permission block is clearly fenced under a heading. There is minor redundancy in that the permission section already implies read-only and the trailing 'Read-only account operation.' restates annotation data, but overall the text is well organized and not padded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list tool with no output schema and exhaustive parameter documentation, the definition covers what an agent needs to call it correctly: purpose and authorization. It does not touch on the shape of returned records or pagination continuation, but the schema already carries pagination semantics.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all eight parameters (pagination, cursor, sort_by, sort_direction, all_pages, max_items) are already fully documented in the schema. The description adds no parameter meaning beyond that, which is the correct baseline for a tool whose schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Lists allowed domains') plus its scope ('belonging to the account'), so an agent can immediately tell what data is returned. It does not, however, name or distinguish itself from the closely named siblings create_allowed_domain, get_allowed_domain, and delete_allowed_domain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this versus get_allowed_domain or the create/delete counterparts, nor when to prefer offset (page) vs cursor pagination. Usage is left entirely to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools