Delete Media Extended Audio Description

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructive=true, idempotent=false and openWorld=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds value beyond them by disclosing the confirm=true gating requirement and non-obvious side effects ('notify people or incur provider charges'), though 'may share access' is vague.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, mutation verb front-loaded, no filler. The phrase 'for the requested mutation' is slightly redundant padding but costs little.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive, non-idempotent delete with 100% schema coverage, annotations covering safety, and no output schema, the description is nearly sufficient. It stops short of stating irreversibility or failure behavior, which would matter for an agent deciding whether to call it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and every parameter is already documented there: 'id' as the hashed id, 'account' as the credential selector, and 'confirm' with its user-intent rule. The description restates 'hashed id' and 'confirm=true' without adding format or constraint detail, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Deletes') and a precise resource ('extended audio description') addressed by its hashed id. This maps cleanly onto the sibling set, distinguishing it from get_media_extended_audio_description and list_media_extended_audio_descriptions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives one actionable precondition — confirm=true — but never states when to prefer this over an alternative (e.g., whether the resource can be restored, or that the id should first come from the list/get siblings). Usage is implied rather than guided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.