Alias cũ của cloud_vps_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It adds the useful sandbox behavior—free trial and no wallet required—but does not disclose the core creation behavior, billing implications, asynchronous behavior, or any side effects of creating a VPS.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two compact sentences with no filler; the alias guidance is front-loaded and the sandbox note is relevant. Minor deduction because the sandbox statement repeats the schema's existing property description, so it does not add wholly new information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a resource-creating tool with 9 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It relies heavily on the alias relationship to infer behavior and only documents one parameter, leaving most operational details and expected outputs undocumented.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 11%, so the description must compensate for the other 8 parameters, but it only explains sandbox. Key parameters like cpu, ram_gb, disk_gb, plan_code, package_slug, and billing_mode receive no semantic guidance beyond their names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies the tool as a compatibility alias for cloud_vps_create, so its purpose—creating a VPS—is recoverable from the canonical sibling's name and title. It does not directly state 'create a VPS,' but the alias relationship plus the name makes the intended action clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says to use cloud_vps_create for new integrations ('dùng cloud_vps_create cho tích hợp mới'), which gives a clear when-not-to-use directive and names the preferred alternative. This is strong routing guidance for an agent choosing between alias and canonical tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.