Đọc ngân sách MONA Cloud

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the data returned (limits and usage by period) and implies a non-mutating operation, but it does not state authorization needs, what 'period' means, or the output format. This is minimal but not misleading.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence with no filler. It front-loads the action and the subject matter, which is appropriate for a parameterless read tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description must explain what the agent will get back; it does say 'limits and usage by period.' However, 'period' is left ambiguous and there is no mention of whether this reflects the current billing cycle or how the data is structured, so the description is only moderately complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline of 4 applies. The description appropriately implies no configuration is needed beyond calling the tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Liệt kê' = list) and names the resource (limits and usage by period), making the tool's read intent clear. It does not explicitly distinguish itself from siblings like cloud_budget_set or cloud_usage, but the 'get' vs 'set' pairing strongly signals a read operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The read-only usage is implied by the verb 'Liệt kê' and the tool name, suggesting it should be used when the agent needs to check budget limits or consumed amounts. However, it provides no explicit guidance about when to prefer this over cloud_balance, cloud_usage, or cloud_budget_set.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.