Hồ sơ tài khoản MONA Pay

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the burden. 'Get' implies a read-only operation and 'đang đăng nhập' indicates the current authenticated account, which is useful. However, the description does not explicitly state side-effect-free behavior, error conditions, or authentication requirements beyond the implication.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences with no filler, and the bilingual wording is front-loaded with the core action. It is concise while conveying the resource, scope, and sample output fields.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple no-parameter profile tool with no output schema, the description is reasonably complete by naming the data it returns (id, tên, trạng thái). It lacks differentiation from sibling tools, but that gap is more about usage guidance than contextual completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool accepts zero parameters, so the description does not need to explain parameter meanings. The baseline for zero-parameter tools is 4, and the description appropriately confirms the operation without inventing parameter details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Get') and resource ('current MONA Pay client profile') and even lists the expected fields (id, tên, trạng thái). However, it does not distinguish this tool from the sibling monapay_whoami, which appears to serve the same purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives some context ('đang đăng nhập' / currently logged in) but provides no when-to-use guidance or exclusions. With siblings like monapay_whoami and monapay_get_payment_profile nearby, an agent cannot tell when to choose this tool over those.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.