Chi tiết MONA Agent template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It clearly states the operation is 'Read', implying a non-mutating action, and enumerates the template components it accesses. However, it does not describe failure behavior, output format, or whether missing files are handled, leaving some gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One short sentence, front-loaded with the action and the enumerated template components. Every word earns its place; there is no redundant explanation or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read operation with no output schema, the description is mostly complete: it identifies the target and the scope of what is read. It lacks only minor behavioral details like what happens if the template does not exist, but overall it gives an agent enough context to call correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description only says 'của một template' (of a template), which merely echoes the property name without adding format details, examples, or how to construct the value. It does not compensate for the schema's lack of descriptive guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a clear verb 'Đọc' (Read) and specifies the exact resource: the README, AGENTS.md, tools, deploy, checklist, and skills of a template. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like agent_templates_list (which lists templates) and agent_deploy (which deploys).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used to inspect template contents, but it does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives or mention any exclusions. The context signals and sibling names help, but the description itself offers no direct routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.