Danh sách webhook email

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the behavioral burden. 'Inspect' and 'registered' clearly imply a read-only listing of existing webhooks, which is the key trait. However, it does not disclose auth requirements, return format, pagination, or explicitly confirm that no changes are made.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short clauses: one frames the use case, the other states the resource scope. There is no filler or redundant detail beyond the intentional bilingual mirroring.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter list operation, the description supplies the trigger condition and the resource scope. The absence of response-shape details is a minor gap given no output schema, but not a blocking omission.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and 100% schema coverage, so there is nothing for the description to add. The 0-parameter baseline of 4 applies; no param semantics are needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('liệt kê' / 'inspect') on a specific resource ('webhook email' / 'registered email webhooks'). The 'email' qualifier and 'registered' wording clearly separate it from create/test webhook siblings and from the monapay webhook tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly gives a trigger context: 'Khi kiểm tra cấu hình sự kiện của app' (when checking app event configuration). It does not name alternatives or state when not to use it, so it lacks full exclusionary routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.