aya_framework_packs_selecionar

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It says the tool 'selects' packs but does not state whether this is read-only, whether it persists or locks anything, or what the return value looks like. This is a significant gap for an unannotated tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no filler. Every word adds meaning, and it is appropriately sized for a tool with one parameter and a straightforward selection behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and no parameter coverage, the description is too thin. It does not explain expected output, side effects, or how 'consulta' should be constructed, leaving an agent without enough information to invoke the tool confidently beyond guessing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'consulta' has 0% schema coverage. The description hints that the query relates to task triggers, but it does not explain the expected format, content, or examples. It adds some meaning beyond the bare schema, but not enough to fully compensate for the lack of parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('seleciona') and resource ('packs Agents') with a mechanism ('por gatilhos da tarefa'). It naturally distinguishes itself from siblings like aya_framework_packs_listar (listing) and aya_framework_pack_montar (assembling), so an agent can tell it apart.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'por gatilhos da tarefa' implies the tool is for automatic selection based on task triggers, but there is no explicit when-to-use guidance or contrast with sibling tools. Usage context is only implied, not stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.