AyA-MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to AyA-MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for the OffByOne website factory, enabling agents to generate, validate, and manage full-stack web projects through safe, deterministic tools.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA modular, security-focused MCP server that exposes enterprise-ready tools for filesystem, database, REST API, system utilities, and AI generation, with authentication, authorization, and audit logging.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA secure, production-grade MCP server that provides filesystem operations, AST math evaluation, and system diagnostics for LLM agents.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA production-oriented MCP server for coding agents that enables multi-project management through secure file operations, Git integration, and safe command execution. It supports project discovery across multiple root directories and provides robust audit logging with both STDIO and HTTP transport options.2 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA reusable MCP server providing shared, versioned context across AI agents and devices via a private GitHub workspace, with tools to discover projects, bootstrap, query, and close out task state.42MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceGoverns and audits AI coding agents via command gating, cryptographic logging, and multi-agent orchestration, exposed as an MCP server.35 npm4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 88 tools
The tools are grouped by domain, but there are large overlapping clusters of context/validation/audit tools, such as montar_contexto vs montar_contexto_completo vs contexto_empresa_planejar, and validacao_gates vs validacao_aprovar_saida vs evidencia_validar_tarefa. An agent would need to read many descriptions carefully to avoid selecting the wrong gate/audit/context tool.
All names share the aya_ prefix, snake_case, and a domain segment, which makes them recognizable and searchable. However, word order is inconsistent (verb_object vs object_verb) and several tools are noun phrases rather than verb actions, such as aya_codigo_outline, aya_games_checklist, and aya_mcps_catalogo_referencia.
Exposing 88 tools in a single MCP is an extreme count and will heavily impact context usage and tool-selection accuracy. Even with the toolset-reduction mechanisms mentioned, the full surface is far beyond a well-scoped 3-15 tool set.
The set is very thorough for validation, memory, evidence, and framework governance, with both read and mutation operations for memory, code, and files. However, there are notable gaps: no general project file read, no create/update/delete lifecycle for requirements/rules/tasks, and MCP policy tools stop at classification/recommendation without applying permissions.