luceed_tecajna_lista

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full disclosure burden, yet it says nothing about authentication, rate limits, pagination, or response shape. 'List' weakly implies a read-only operation, but nothing is confirmed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the resource and then the action. Efficient, though the second sentence is largely redundant with the enum already in the schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description does not compensate by describing what a 'lista' call returns or when it is appropriate. An agent has essentially only the name and enum to work with.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single enum parameter is fully documented there, so baseline 3 applies. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema, merely repeating 'lista' as the action.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a concrete resource ('Currency exchange rate list'), which separates it from siblings like luceed_cijene or luceed_cjenik. However, it largely restates the tool name (tecajna_lista = exchange rate list) and adds no verb beyond the implied 'list', so it is clear but thin.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no indication of when to use this tool versus alternatives such as luceed_cijene or luceed_cjenik, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. 'Actions: lista' simply echoes the only enum value in the schema.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.