luceed_prodajne_akcije

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It implies a read/list operation through 'lista' but never states that it is read-only, what it returns, or any permission/rate considerations, leaving the agent to infer behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is very short and the resource is front-loaded. Minor redundancy between 'Sales campaigns 2.0' and 'Sales campaigns v2 (prodajneakcije)' costs it a point, but there is no wasted prose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter list tool with a fully documented schema and no output schema, the essentials are present. However, the missing distinction from the sibling luceed_akcije and the absent read-only/return context leave it only minimally complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and there is a single enum parameter, so the schema already documents 'action' and its only value 'lista'. The description's 'Actions: lista' adds nothing beyond the enum, matching the baseline 3 for schema-covered params.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the resource (sales campaigns, v2, prodajneakcije) and hints at the operation via 'Actions: lista', but never states a clear verb like 'list'. It does not differentiate itself from the sibling luceed_akcije, leaving the v1/v2 distinction implicit in '2.0'/'v2'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus luceed_akcije or the other sales-related siblings. The only usage signal is the enum value 'lista', which merely restates the single permitted action.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.