luceed_akcije

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It does not state that this is a read-only listing operation, what authentication or permissions are needed, or what the response contains; it only names the endpoint action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and wastes little space, but "Actions: lista" is cryptic and the opening "Sales campaigns 1.0" adds little value. It is terse without being appropriately informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description should explain what listing promotional campaigns returns, but it gives no information about the response shape or record fields. For a list tool with no annotations and no output schema, this is a notable gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% description coverage and only one parameter (`action`) with a single enum value, so the schema already fully documents the input. The description adds no meaning beyond restating that the action is "lista," which is the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies the resource as promotional campaigns ("akcije") and the action as "lista," but it does not translate or explain "lista" and does not distinguish this tool from the very similar sibling `luceed_prodajne_akcije`. The purpose is inferable but not sharply stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It says only that the action is "lista," with no guidance on when to use this tool versus the closely related `luceed_prodajne_akcije` or other sales-related siblings. The agent must infer the usage context from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.